Reflection Paper on Descartes

Joe Niro record 113 Descartes Reflection Paper Descartes was a very intelligent man and was wise to(p) in galore(postnominal) subjects. One of which was his understanding of background. One might carry themselves, What is Reason? According to Descartes, the ability to reason is a sympathetic attribute that does non differ from person to person. He believed that every unity had the same ability to reason rationally. It is one(a)s earlier opinions, knowledge, and teachings of a subject that causes a leaving in our reactions and results. 1 Descartes discussed that in sight for him to reason, he would premier unresolved his mind of all early(prenominal) knowledge.He believed that this would rid him of any bias and antecedent opinions he might have on a matter to go understand and reason. He would base his reason solely on facts provided as manifest. Descartes also did not force his sentiment on reasoning upon anyone else. He would merely write his own approach in whic h he would bind to reason. 2 He set four feels to be followed. 3 His first rule was that he would not accept anything to be true unless presented with evidence to suffer the claim, whatever that claims may be.His second rule was that he would disjoint the two sides of an argument or claim in as many ways as possible to sufficiently reason. Descartes would then, as his third rule states, view each claim step by step, starting with the easiest thought to comprehend, then progressively and chronologically view more of each claim. His net rule was to not omit anything or any view. Instead he would view everything as plausible and, by following all prior steps, would then be able to reason and make a decisive conclusion.The real key statement Descartes was making about reason is that it is of the humans decision as to what the logical reasoning is for something. It is our own past experiences and views that cause a difference in opinion and reason. In order to view reason as Desca rtes had, one must open ones mind to many possibilities. In comparison to a tripe of water one cannot possibly fill an already full meth, and one can only fill a half full glass so much. To fill said glass, the glass must be empty. alike is to Descartes definition of reason. One must first empty their mind in order to understand and reason.Nothing is concrete and all is plausible. This is Descartes definition of reason. Humes is other philosopher who made a stand on the definition of reason. He motto that there was a distinct different between a tattle of ideas and a matter of fact. If viewing with an open mind as Descartes would support, ones claims may not be supported with sufficient evidence, but that alone does not disprove that claim, however, is therefore an idea. A matter of fact would be a claim that is supported by sufficient evidence that can support that claim legitimately.