Is Now the Time for Reparations for African Americans? Essay

Reparations for African Americans was a projected base that would dish out African Americans get a form of earnings that would furbish up up for the severe punishing and sufferings they all faced as a culture, and as slaves. Robert L. Allen and The economist some(prenominal) argue on reparations for African Americans and powerfully oppose based on their views. Robert L. Allen, a professor strongly believes that reparations for African Americans is necessary in order to achieve economically in gild within the join States, while opposing, the staff writers of The economic expert question if the reparations insurance for African Americans is appropriate. The Economist argues that it is pointless for African Americans to roll in the hay reparations because of the difficulty determination the olden African American victims of slavery, as well as the past racial harassments are no longer with nowadayss society, so they say.Shortly after the Civil War ended, an anti-slavery acti vist, Sojourner rectitude organized a entreaty campaign for slaves. the trues petition campaign was in the first place focused on seeking free public land for the origin slaves. To support her campaign, she assertd, America owes to my people some of the dividends. She can afford to comport and she must pay. I shall make them understand that there is a debt to the blackamoor people which they can never repay. At least, then, they must make amends. Unfortunately, Truths petition campaign was unsuccessful. Truth felt as if giving former slaves dividends would windlessness be the fair thing to do she wanted America to be considerate of the situation and understand that it was only right to pay approve for the pain and suffering they caused African Americans and the past slaves to face for countless years.In the 1890s, another black woman, Callie folk, filed lawsuits and petitioned the Congress for reparations payments to African Americans, just as Sojourner Truth tried. Lucki ly, House was assisted by Frederick Douglas, but no success was a state of warded to African Americans. After the many failed attempts, religious leaders became involved Bishop Henry McNeal food turner stated We have worked, enriched the country and supported give it a standing among the powers of the humankind Bishop Henry McNeal Turner felt that African Americans should be paid at least 40 billion dollars for the labor they put in to help enrich the country and give America standing powers among the earth.Robert L. Allen supports reparations for African Americans for this carry reason, African Americans going through consecutive problems throughout history involving the United States. Robert argues that Reparations provide a framework for the redistribution of wealth within the existing governmental economy, and thereby moving towards economic extend toity between whites and blacks. Robert also provided teaching on the Republic of New Africa (RNA), which was founded in 1968. The purpose of the RNA was to set in motion an independent Black Republic in 5 southern states with bear-sized African American populations. The RNA shortly developed the Anti-Depression Program which called for $ three hundred billion in reparations from the United States.The Economist oppose against reparations for African Americans. The Economist feels that if you werent physically active during the times of slavery, then you should not receive any benefits by getting rewards. Edward Fagan, a New York lawyer, launched a war against firms that profited from slavery. He argued that there should not be any limitations for crime against humanity. Fagan mute that by rebelling against reparations for African Americans that shareholder lawsuits, boycotts, and race riots would possibly occur.In conclusion, both Robert L. Allen and the staff writers from The Economist had influential arguments, but I would have to consent with Robert Allens point of view. I believe that reparations a re indeed a necessity to African Americans in todays society. Robert Allens arguments state that these reparations helps the world, benefiting the social and economic lives of African Americans while The Economist sees it as organism something that is worthless for the society, having no effect on the African American society.The Economist thinks that reparations for African Americans are not needed anymore because everyone can help themselves. Opposing, Robert thinks that people who oppose reparations for African Americans are just ignorant because they know that its a positive policy they are just petrified of the particular that the outcome will really benefit many lives influentially. I add together with Robert, because he mentioned that reparations are a policy that gives equal opportunity to everyone. par and equivalence is an asset that improves many things for a nation to be equal and all on one page, with the reparations of African Americans, would be astonishing. 1 . bl oody shame Frances Berry and John W. Blassingame, Long Memory The Black Experience in America (New York Oxford University Press, 1982), p. 406 Neil Irvin Painter, Sojourner Truth A Life, A Symbol (New York W.W. Norton & Co., 1996), p.244. 2 . Quoted in Jeanette Davis-Adeshote, Black Survival in White America (Orange, NJ Bryant and Dillon Publishers, 1995), p.87. 3 . Berry and Blassingame, Long Memory, p. 406 4 . Ibid, p.405 5 . Imari Abubakari Obadele I, Foundations of the Black Nation (Detroit House of Songhay, 1975), p.68